The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints<\/a> is true. It is that simple.<\/p>\nOnce we have a foundational testimony of the Book of Mormon, then any question or challenge we confront in life, however difficult it may seem, can be approached with faith, not doubt. Why? Because the keystone of our religion\u2014the Book of Mormon and its witness of Jesus Christ\u2014has also become the keystone of our testimony, which keystone holds our testimony securely in place.<\/p>\n
Thus the Book of Mormon has become the focal point of attack by many of our critics: disprove the Book of Mormon and you disprove the Church and undermine testimonies.<\/p>\n
But this is no easy task\u2014in fact, it is impossible, because the Book of Mormon is true. Eleven witnesses, in addition to Joseph Smith, saw the gold plates, millions of believers have testified of its truthfulness, and the book is readily available for examination. Critics must either dismiss the Book of Mormon with a sheepish shrug or produce a viable alternative to Joseph Smith\u2019s account; namely, that he translated it by the gift and power of God.<\/p>\n
What then are those alternative arguments presented by our critics for the origin of the Book of Mormon, and what is the truth?<\/p>\n
Argument 1: Joseph Smith, Alleged to Be an Ignorant Man, Wrote the Book of Mormon<\/b><\/h2>\n
In 1831 a clergyman named Alexander Campbell proposed that Joseph Smith wrote rather than translated the Book of Mormon:<\/p>\n
There never was a book more evidently written by one set of fingers, nor more certainly conceived in one cranium .\u00a0.\u00a0. , than this .\u00a0.\u00a0. book. .\u00a0.\u00a0. I cannot doubt for a single moment that<\/i> [Joseph Smith] is the sole author and proprietor of it.<\/i>3<\/sup><\/p>\nCampbell also declared that \u201c[Joseph was] as ignorant and as impudent a knave as ever wrote a book.\u201d4<\/sup> But this assertion that Joseph Smith, who was \u201cignorant\u201d and lacked education, could write such a work as the Book of Mormon seemed so preposterous to other contemporary critics that they readily dismissed it. Even Campbell himself, who proposed this theory, later abandoned it in favor of another alternative.5<\/sup><\/p>\nSo the early theories about the origin of the Book of Mormon started to focus on the premise that Joseph Smith, an unlearned man, was simply incapable of writing such a complex book. After all, he was but twenty-three years of age, a simple plowboy from western New York, and he had little formal education. Consequently the early critics concluded there must be some other explanation for the origin of the Book of Mormon than the unlikely possibility that Joseph wrote it.<\/p>\n
Argument 2: Someone Else Wrote It<\/b><\/h2>\n
Accordingly, some critics proposed the theory that Joseph Smith conspired with someone who had the education, intelligence, and skills to write the Book of Mormon.6<\/sup> One candidate for its authorship was Oliver Cowdery. After all, he was a schoolteacher, a scribe, and later a lawyer. But a major problem arose for the critics: Oliver never claimed to have written any portion of the book; in fact, he testified to the contrary:<\/p>\nI wrote, with my own pen, the entire Book of Mormon (save a few pages) as it fell from the lips of\u00a0the\u00a0Prophet Joseph Smith, as he translated it by the\u00a0gift and power of God. .\u00a0.\u00a0. That book is <\/i>true.<\/i><\/b>7<\/sup><\/p>\nEven though Oliver was excommunicated from the Church and it was some years before he returned, he remained true at all times to his testimony, even on his deathbed. As a result, this argument receives little acceptance today.8<\/sup><\/p>\nAnother candidate for authorship of the Book of Mormon was Sidney Rigdon. He was a Protestant minister and theologian. The supreme irony of this argument, however, is that he was converted by the very book he was supposed to have written. Parley\u00a0P. Pratt, a former member of Rigdon\u2019s congregation, introduced him to the Book of Mormon in October 1830\u2014about six months after the Book of Mormon had already been published. Do we have any witnesses that this is how Sidney Rigdon was converted? We do. In fact, the historical evidence is compelling.9<\/sup><\/p>\nFirst, Sidney Rigdon\u2019s daughter, Nancy Rigdon Ellis, was eight years old when Parley\u00a0P. Pratt and Oliver Cowdery presented her father with a copy of the Book of Mormon in their home. She said that she recalled the event because of the conflict that arose:<\/p>\n
I saw them hand<\/i> [my father] the book, <\/i>and I am as positive as can be that he never saw it before.<\/i><\/b> He read it\u00a0and examined it for about an hour and then threw it down and said he did not believe a word in it.<\/i>10<\/sup><\/p>\nLater, however, he did accept the Book of Mormon, joined the Church, and became one of its leaders.<\/p>\n
Second, Sidney Rigdon\u2019s son John spoke to his father as he lay on his deathbed: \u201c[Father], you owe it to me and to your family to tell [the truth about the Book of Mormon].\u201d<\/p>\n
In other words, this is the day of reckoning; be totally honest before you go to the judgment bar.<\/p>\n
The son then recounted his father\u2019s response: \u201cMy father looked at me a moment, raised his hand above his head and slowly said, with tears glistening in his eyes: \u2018My son, I can swear before high heaven that what I have told you about the origin of\u00a0that book is true.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
After this tender moment, the son said, \u201cI believed him.\u201d11<\/sup><\/p>\nLater, John joined the Church, and thus another argument fell by the wayside.<\/p>\n
Argument 3: The Book of Mormon Was Plagiarized from Other Books<\/b><\/h2>\n
Other critics offered a different line of attack; namely, that Joseph Smith plagiarized the Book of Mormon (at least its historical content) from other existing books. One such theory alleged that Joseph Smith copied from the Solomon Spaulding manuscript\u2014an unpublished manuscript written about 1812 by a man named Solomon Spaulding, who had once been a Protestant minister. It is a fictional account of ancient Romans who were sailing for England but were blown off course and landed in North America. When the critics were asked to produce the manuscript for comparison with the Book of Mormon, they conveniently claimed it was lost.12<\/sup><\/p>\nHowever, with the passage of time, the manuscript was found in 1884 by a Mr.\u00a0L.\u00a0L. Rice. He found the alleged smoking gun in the personal historical papers of one of the very critics who had claimed the manuscript was lost. Knowing of its alleged connection to the Book of Mormon, Mr.\u00a0Rice, Mr.\u00a0James Fairchild, and others (none of whom were members of the LDS Church), reviewed it and concluded, \u201c[We] compared it with the Book of Mormon and could detect no resemblance between the two, in general or in detail.<\/i>13<\/sup><\/p>\nWhen I was in my twenties, I saw a notice from the Church History Department that stated that a copy of the Solomon Spaulding manuscript could be purchased for a dollar. I ordered a copy and likewise found no meaningful relationship whatsoever between the two books.14<\/sup><\/p>\nWith the demise of this argument, critics alleged that the supposed source for the Book of Mormon was another book titled View of the Hebrews,<\/i> written by Ethan Smith in 1823. This book was an attempt to prove that the Native Americans were descendants of the lost ten tribes of Israel.15<\/sup> In essence, the critics claimed that this was the historical basis for the Book of Mormon.<\/p>\nThere is a simple test to determine if the Book of Mormon was copied from View of the Hebrews:<\/i> simply compare the two books and decide for yourself. With complete academic honesty, B.\u00a0H. Roberts, one of the leading scholars of the Church, listed some possible parallels16<\/sup> between the two books, but he then reached this conclusion: \u201cI am taking the position that our faith is not only unshaken but unshakable in the Book of Mormon, and therefore we can look without fear upon all that can be said against it.\u201d17<\/sup> Shortly before his death, Roberts \u00adfurther declared, \u201cEthan Smith played no part in the formation of the Book of Mormon.\u201d18<\/sup><\/p>\nI too have read View of the Hebrews<\/i> and the Book of Mormon. Suffice it to say, these two books have totally different objectives and writing styles. For example, the Book of Mormon\u2019s principal focus is to testify of Jesus Christ and His doctrine. Accordingly, the historical setting is not the focus, but it is rather the background music that gives context and emphasis to the doctrine. The principal focus, however, for View of the Hebrews<\/i> is to historically connect the Native Americans to the ancient Hebrews. In addition, View of the Hebrews<\/i> is a series of independent quotes and purported evidences to prove its theory. On the other hand, the Book of Mormon is a cohesive narrative\u2014a story of families and prophets who struggled to live God\u2019s word. The purpose and style of these two books is most disparate.19<\/sup> Any honest reader can determine that for himself.<\/p>\nArgument 4: Joseph Suffered from a Mental Illness<\/b><\/h2>\n
Those who advanced this argument alleged that such mental disorders bestowed upon Joseph Smith additional powers and skills that enabled him to write what he could not otherwise have written on his own.20<\/sup><\/p>\nIn 1931 Harry\u00a0M. Beardsley wrote, \u201cThe Book of Mormon<\/i> is a product of .\u00a0.\u00a0. a mind characterized by the symptoms of the most prevalent of mental diseases of adolescence\u2014dementia praecox,\u201d21<\/sup> sometimes referred to as schizophrenia.<\/p>\nThere are fatal defects, however, with such an argument. First, there is no credible evidence that Joseph had any form of mental illness. Second, there is no substantiating evidence that such physical or mental conditions magically bestow upon an untrained writer, such as Joseph Smith, the ability to instantly become a skilled writer. And third, the book is not characteristic of the mentally ill. Even Fawn\u00a0M. Brodie, an avid critic of\u00a0Joseph Smith, acknowledged this latter fact:<\/p>\n
Recent critics who insist that Joseph Smith suffered from delusions have ignored in the Book of Mormon contrary evidence difficult to override.<\/i><\/b> Its very coherence belies their claims. .\u00a0.\u00a0.<\/i><\/p>\n
.\u00a0.\u00a0. Its structure shows elaborate design, its narrative is spun coherently, and it demonstrates throughout a unity of purpose.<\/i>22<\/sup><\/p>\nAs you would expect, these arguments that Joseph Smith suffered from a mental illness never got much traction.23<\/sup><\/p>\nArgument 5: Joseph Smith Was a Creative Genius Who, Shaped by His Environment, Wrote the Book of Mormon<\/b><\/h2>\n
This argument has become a principal one used by many if not most critics today. It is a 180-degree turnabout from the premise of earlier critics; namely, that Joseph was illiterate, ignorant, and incapable of writing such a work on his own. In fact, we have come full circle, back to the same argument originally made by Alexander Campbell in 1831, except that now Joseph Smith is considered brilliant rather than ignorant.<\/p>\n
Fawn Brodie, perhaps the chief proponent of this argument, opined that Joseph Smith, the unschooled farm boy, was a creative genius who, fashioned by his environment and the influence of local history books and resources, personally wrote the Book of Mormon. Remarkably, Fawn Brodie wrote:<\/p>\n
Never having written a line of fiction,<\/i> [Joseph Smith] laid out for himself a task that would have given the most experienced novelist pause. <\/i>But possibly because of this very inexperience he plunged into the story.<\/i><\/b>24<\/sup><\/p>\nWhen one contemplates that assertion, it is nothing short of mind-boggling. Was it this same inexperience that helped him create hundreds of names, weave them into the most complex set of events, and then thread them together in a harmonious story resplendent with profound doctrinal insights? By her very acknowledgment of Joseph\u2019s inexperience, she has magnified the improbability of Joseph writing this monumental work on his\u00a0own.<\/p>\n
Nonetheless, others have bought into this \u00adargument\u2014lock, stock, and barrel. Why? Because they have nowhere else to go except to admit that Joseph translated the Book of Mormon by the gift and power of God\u2014a place they desperately do not want to go. These latter critics have added one more ingredient to the mix. Joseph Smith, they said, besides being a genius, was suffering from narcissistic personality disorder or dissociative disorder or depression.25<\/sup> Here we are back again to the mental disorder theories that proved so ineffective in the\u00a0past.26<\/sup><\/p>\nIn order to account for the history of the Book of Mormon, these critics claim that Joseph must have read or been conversant with a staggering number of books or ideas related to them. In fact, one author has suggested that Joseph may have read or gleaned information from more than thirty books in nearby libraries in order to gather necessary information about the early Americans.27<\/sup> The claim is then made that these books\u2014or discussions of the same in newspapers or conversations\u2014became the basis for the historical narrative in the Book of Mormon.28<\/sup><\/p>\nHow might one counter this argument? Here is a list of questions that an honest seeker of truth might raise:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Is there a single reference\u2014just one\u2014in Joseph\u2019s journals or written correspondence suggesting he might have read or had conversations concerning any of these historical sources before translating the Book of Mormon? No.29<\/sup><\/p>\n\u2022 Is there any evidence he visited the libraries where these books were supposedly located? No.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Did Emma Smith, who was married to him, ever comment that he referred to any of these books before the Book of Mormon was translated? No.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Is there any record that he had any of these books present when he translated the Book of\u00a0Mormon? No.<\/p>\n
How many nos does it take to expose the critics\u2019 arguments as pure speculation\u2014nothing more than sand castles that come crashing down when the first waves of honest questions appear on the scene.<\/p>\n
Do the critics expect us to believe that Joseph searched out and studied all these resources on Native American life; inhaled the related conversations on the topic; winnowed out the irrelevant; organized the remainder into an intricate story involving hundreds of characters, numerous locations, and detailed war strategies; and then dictated it with perfect recollection, without any notes whatsoever\u2014no outline, no three-by-five cards, nothing\u2014a fact acknowledged even among the critics?30<\/sup> And during it all, no one remembered him going to these libraries, bringing any such books home, having any conversations concerning this research, or making any diary entries to the same. Where, I ask you, is the hard evidence?<\/p>\nWhere Did Joseph Get the Doctrine?<\/b><\/h2>\n
Even if Joseph had obtained historical facts from local libraries or community conversations\u2014for which there is no substantiating evidence\u2014the real issue still remains: Where did he get the deep and expansive doctrine taught in the Book of Mormon\u2014much of which is contrary to the religious beliefs of his time? For example, contemporary Christianity taught that the Fall was a negative, not a positive, step forward, as taught in the Book of Mormon (see 2\u00a0Nephi 2).<\/p>\n
Likewise, contrary to contemporary beliefs, the Book of Mormon refers to a premortal existence in Alma\u00a013 (see Alma 13:1\u201311) and to a postmortal spirit world in Alma 40 (see Alma 40:11\u201314). Where did Joseph Smith get these profound doctrinal truths that were in fact contrary to the prevailing doctrinal teachings of his time? Where did he get the stunning sermon on faith in Alma\u00a032? Or one of the greatest sermons ever recorded in all scripture on the Savior\u2019s Atonement as delivered by King Benjamin (see Mosiah 2\u20135)? Or the allegory of the olive tree with all its complexity and doctrinal richness (see Jacob 5)? When I read that allegory, I have to map it out to follow its intricacies. Are we supposed to believe that Joseph Smith just dictated these sermons off the top of his head with no notes whatsoever?<\/p>\n
The doctrinal truths taught in the Book of Mormon are overwhelming evidence of its divine authenticity. Nephi prophesied that in our day an exceeding great many would stumble in finding the truth. Why? \u201cBecause of the many plain and precious things which have been taken out of the [Bible]\u201d (1\u00a0Nephi 13:29). Here are but two examples of plain and precious doctrinal truths that were clarified or restored in the Book of Mormon:<\/p>\n
1. Baptism. Much of the Christian world debates whether or not baptism is essential for salvation; they stumble over this issue. Let me read just one of many scriptures on this subject from the Book of Mormon: \u201c[God] commandeth all men that they must repent, and be baptized in his name, .\u00a0.\u00a0. or they cannot be saved in the kingdom of God\u201d (2\u00a0Nephi 9:23). Should there be any debate about the necessity of baptism after that scripture? The Book of Mormon makes clear that which is unclear to much of the Christian world.<\/p>\n
The majority of the Christian world embraces sprinkling and pouring as legitimate modes of baptism. The Savior Himself addressed this issue in the Book of Mormon: \u201cThen shall ye immerse<\/i> them in the water, and come forth again out of the water\u201d (3\u00a0Nephi 11:26; emphasis added). What is ambiguous for many is crystal clear in the Book of Mormon. Must one be baptized by authority, or is sincerity sufficient? Do we make covenants at the time of baptism, and, if so, what are those covenants? Should infants be baptized?<\/p>\n
Again and again the Book of Mormon comes to the rescue, giving answers and restoring many plain and precious truths about baptism that were distorted or lost during the Apostasy. How did Joseph Smith know all these answers when the rest of the Christian world was so confused? Because he received them by revelation from God as he translated the Book of Mormon.<\/p>\n
2. What about Christ\u2019s Atonement\u2014the central doctrine of all Christianity? The clarity and expansiveness of this doctrine as taught in the Book of Mormon is beyond honest dispute. The Old and New Testaments have some scattered doctrinal gems on the Atonement (which we greatly appreciate and benefit from), but the Book of Mormon has numerous sermons\u2014entire master\u00adpieces\u2014on the subject. For example:<\/p>\n
a. 2\u00a0Nephi\u00a02 is a mind-expanding sermon on the relationship between the Fall and Christ\u2019s Atonement. While the rest of the Christian world believes that the Fall was a step backward in man\u2019s progress, Lehi taught us the truth\u2014that the Fall coupled with the Atonement is a giant step forward.<\/p>\n
b. 2\u00a0Nephi 9:7 introduces for the first time the phrase \u201can infinite atonement,\u201d revealing the expansiveness, scope, and depth of Christ\u2019s saving power.<\/p>\n
c. Mosiah\u00a02\u20135 is King Benjamin\u2019s sermon. It gives insights about the depth of Christ\u2019s suffering, the retroactive as well as prospective nature of Christ\u2019s Atonement, and the power of the Atonement to remove our guilt as well as our sins.<\/p>\n
d. Alma\u00a07 explains that the Savior suffered not only for our sins but also for our \u201cpains and afflictions and temptations of every kind\u201d (Alma 7:11).<\/p>\n
e. 3\u00a0Nephi\u00a011 is the most powerful witness we have of the resurrected Lord, as 2,500 believers, consisting of men, women, and children (see 3\u00a0Nephi 17:25) came forth and \u201cthrust their hands into his side,\u201d felt \u201cthe prints of the nails in his hands and in his feet,\u201d and \u201cdid know of a surety and did bear record\u201d (3\u00a0Nephi 11:15) that He was the Son of God. Who can read that account and not feel the witness of the Spirit testifying of its truthfulness?<\/p>\n
f. The Bible teaches us that, through the Atone\u00adment, Christ can make us clean; the Book of Mormon teaches us that, through the Atonement, Christ can also make us perfect (see Moroni 10:32\u201333).31<\/sup><\/p>\nDoes anyone honestly believe that Joseph Smith somehow invented these profound doctrines with their compelling powers of reason, their mind-expanding insights, and their language, which is divinely eloquent? If these doctrines were the product of Joseph\u2019s creative mind, one might ask, \u201cWere there no other creative geniuses in the 1,800 years following Christ\u2019s ministry who could produce similar doctrines?\u201d<\/p>\n
The argument that Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon is simply counter to the realities of life. It is one thing to have creative ideas; it is quite another to put them into a complex but coherent and harmonious whole, inundated with majestic doctrinal truths and all done in a single draft in less than ninety days. Joseph Smith\u2019s wife, Emma, the person who knew him better than any other, confirmed this conclusion: \u201cJoseph Smith [as a young man] could neither write nor dictate a coherent and well-worded letter; let alone dictat[e] a book like the Book of Mormon.\u201d32<\/sup><\/p>\nA Parable That Counters the Arguments Proposed by Critics<\/b><\/h2>\n
In response to critics\u2019 arguments as to the origin of the Book of Mormon, Hugh Nibley published the following parable:<\/p>\n
A young man once long ago claimed he had found a large diamond in his field as he was ploughing. He put the stone on display to the public free of charge, and everyone took sides. A psychologist showed, by citing some famous case studies, that the young man was suffering from a well-known form of delusion. An historian showed that other men have also claimed to have found diamonds in fields and been deceived. A geologist proved that there were no diamonds in the area but only quartz. .\u00a0.\u00a0. When asked to inspect the stone itself, the geologist declined with a weary, tolerant smile and a kindly shake of the head. .\u00a0.\u00a0. A sociologist showed that only three out of 177 florists\u2019 assistants in four major cities believed the stone was genuine. A clergyman wrote a book to show that it was not the young man but\u00a0someone else who had found the stone.<\/i><\/p>\n
Finally an indigent jeweler .\u00a0.\u00a0. pointed out that since the stone was still available for examination the answer to the question of whether it was a diamond or not had absolutely nothing to do with who found it, or whether the finder was honest or sane, or who believed him, or whether he would know a diamond from a brick .\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0, but was to be answered simply and solely by putting the stone to certain well-known tests for diamonds. Experts on diamonds were called in. Some of them declared it genuine. The others made nervous jokes about it and declared that they could not very well jeopardize their dignity and reputations by appearing to take the thing too seriously. To hide the bad impression thus made, someone came out with the theory that the stone was really a synthetic diamond, very skilfully made, but a fake just the same. The objection to this is that the production of a good synthetic diamond<\/i> [in that day and age] would have been an even more remarkable feat than the finding of a real one.<\/i>33<\/sup><\/p>\nTo suggest that Joseph Smith, a farm boy with little formal education, produced a synthetic work of God in 1829 that has baffled the brightest of critics for almost two centuries would be a more remarkable feat than the simple fact that he obtained the gold plates from an angel of God and translated them by the gift and power of God.<\/p>\n
Other Evidences That the Book of Mormon Is Not\u00a0Man-Made<\/b><\/h2>\n
What other evidence do we have that the Book of Mormon was a God-given translation and not a man-made creation? There are many evidences, but for the sake of time I refer to but one, because it is personal to me. Emma Smith gave the following testimony, as reported by her son Joseph Smith III:<\/p>\n
My belief is that the Book of Mormon is of divine authenticity\u2014I have not the slightest doubt of it.<\/i><\/b> I am satisfied that no man could have dictated the writing of the manuscripts unless he was inspired; for, when acting as his scribe, your father would dictate to me hour after hour; and when returning after meals, or after interruptions, he would at once begin where he had left off, without either seeing the manuscript or having any portion of it read to him. This was a usual thing for him to do. It would have been improbable that a learned man could do this; and, <\/i>for one so ignorant and unlearned as he was, it was simply impossible.<\/i><\/b>34<\/sup><\/p>\nThis may seem insignificant to some, but to me it is astounding. For thirty-four years, as a lawyer, I regularly dictated to my secretary. As I did so, I\u00a0was often interrupted by a phone call or a question. After such interruptions I would invariably ask my secretary, \u201cWhere was I?\u201d<\/p>\n
But Joseph was not dictating or writing a new work; he was receiving revelation by the power of\u00a0God and therefore did not need to ask, \u201cWhere was I?\u201d<\/p>\n
When all is said and done, Joseph Smith\u2019s explanation of the coming forth of the Book of Mormon is the only viable option on the table. Why? Because it is as true as true can be.35<\/sup><\/p>\nHow We Can Discover the Truth of a Divine\u00a0Work<\/b><\/h2>\n
If I were to ask my good Christian friends how they unquestionably know the Bible is the word of God, I do not believe they would cite archaeological discoveries or linguistic connections with ancient Hebrew or Greek as their prime evidence; rather, they would make reference to the Spirit. It\u00a0always comes back to the Spirit. The Spirit that helps me know the Bible is true is the very same Spirit that helps me know the Book of Mormon is\u00a0true.36<\/sup><\/p>\nThe Spirit is the decisive, determining factor\u2014not archaeology, not linguistics, not DNA, and certainly not the theories of man. The Spirit is the only witness that is sure and certain and infallible.<\/p>\n
As a boy of about fifteen or sixteen, I was reading the story of the 2,000 sons of Helaman. I\u00a0marveled at their bravery and the Lord\u2019s protecting hand. Then a voice came to my mind: \u201cThat story is true.\u201d Since then, other confirmations have come.37<\/sup><\/p>\nWhy is it so important for you individually to gain a testimony of the Book of Mormon? Because if you do, it will become your personal iron rod. The mists of darkness may come and the unanswered questions may arise, but through it all you will have your iron rod to cling to\u2014to keep you on the straight and narrow path that leads to eternal life.<\/p>\n
The Lord has promised that if we pray \u201cwith a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto [us], by the power of the Holy Ghost\u201d (Moroni 10:4). If we want the truth that badly, if we are willing to pay that price and be unrelenting in that quest, the answer will eventually come.<\/p>\n
By that promised power of the Holy Ghost I bear my personal witness that the Book of Mormon is God-given and that it is all it claims to be\u2014a pure and powerful witness of Jesus Christ, His divinity, and His doctrine. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given? - BYU Speeches<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BYU Speeches\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-23T15:19:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/The-Book-of-Mormon-Man-Made-or-God-Given-Social-Media-Image-compressor.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"360\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"Tad R. Callister\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/\",\"name\":\"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given? - BYU Speeches\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-01T22:01:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-23T15:19:21+00:00\",\"description\":\"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Speeches\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Tad R. Callister\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/speakers\/tad-r-callister\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/\",\"name\":\"BYU Speeches\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given? - BYU Speeches","description":"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given?","og_description":"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?","og_url":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/","og_site_name":"BYU Speeches","article_modified_time":"2024-04-23T15:19:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":360,"url":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/The-Book-of-Mormon-Man-Made-or-God-Given-Social-Media-Image-compressor.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"21 minutes","Written by":"Tad R. Callister"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/","url":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/","name":"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given? - BYU Speeches","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-11-01T22:01:56+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-23T15:19:21+00:00","description":"Many critics of the Book of Mormon have tried but failed to give a credible alternative to Joseph Smith's testimony of it. How can we know if it is true?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/tad-r-callister\/book-mormon-man-made-god-given\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Speeches","item":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/talks\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Tad R. Callister","item":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/speakers\/tad-r-callister\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The Book of Mormon: Man-Made or God-Given?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/#website","url":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/","name":"BYU Speeches","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/speech\/11278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/speech"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/speech"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/speeches-dev.byu.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}